Not really. No. I'm afraid you've totally missed the point here.

I am saying that if the world at large is not allowed to amplify the experiences of the voices that are never heard, those voices will end up being neglected and ignored.

For example if Akarth refrained from asking me whether he could call me by the N-word, it would never have opened up the reality in which we talked about each others cultures without trying to offend one another. He asked about my culture (the good and bad), I asked about his (the good and bad) we pushed back on whatever we disagreed or sought more clarity, and the whole process helped us appreciate each other's cultures and by proxy, each other's life. I have so much respect for him because I feel that because of this, he has a much deeper understanding of my experience as I do his. A similar idea is what I am talking about. Akash later invited me to his home, deep in the heart of Tamil Nadu where no foreigner ever goes. I was the only one there, and his incite into my life was what helped me connect with people there. He would explain to them the questions they had if I failed and it made it a pleasant experience.

What I am opposing is to silence people like Akash from asking me the uncomfortable questions or delivering those answers (if he got them from me) to people in his community because if I try to get my voice heard by myself without his help, most people will only view me through their biases and won't make an effort to understand.

I hope you get the difference.